The educated Bengali babu, a trusted repository of
Brahminism, leader of the Hindu Maha Sabha, and founder of the Jan Sangh, Shyam
Prasad Mukherjee’s birth centenary is being celebrated by the BJP with much
fanfare in this year 2000 A.D. The BJP Prime Minister, Vajpayee, dashed to
Calcutta on July 6 to pay his guru his respects and West Bengal’s police
minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharya showed his dramatics by refusing to attend this
"undoubtedly great political leader’s" centenary celebration for
ideological reasons. Yet, within 19 days of this statement, which attracted much
media attention for its strong ideological moorings, the CPM minister,
Bhattacharya, did a topsy turvy by declaring that
"on behalf of the state government it has been
decided to celebrate his birth centenary year."
A brief description of this mans’s career is worth
discussing here.
When the country was aflame with the
revolutionaries and the masses launching one attack after another on the British
imperialists and the great heroes of the soil courting martyrdom during the
1929-30 period, this Bengali Hindu babu embarked on his comfortable political
career by getting elected to the Bengal legislature on a Swarajya Party ticket
in 1929. When the masses arose against the ruthless British colonial system,
Mukherjee had this written in his diary on 11 April, 1939 : Obviously being
shocked by the death of the Bengal Governor, Brabourne, that Brabourne was a
great man and his death was a loss to Bengal. This careerist Hindu chauvinist,
joined the Hindu Maha Sabha in 1939 to espouse the cause of the Hindus in India.
In 1941 he joined the Fazlul Haque ministry in Bengal as a representative of the
Hindu Maha Sabha. He wrote an emotional letter to the then Bengal Governor on
March 7, 1942 that he could derive satisfaction if the Indians resisted the
enemies of the British elsewhere, like the Far East, to save British prestige.
Shyam Prasad in his early life stepped into his
father’s shoes by becoming another Vice-Chancellor of Calcutta University. He
was the able son of his father by vitiating the atmosphere of this University
indulging in rampant nepotism in respect of service and letting the family
member candidates come out successfully in the exams. The renowned critic of
English literature, Prof. Subodh Chandra Sengupta, went on record saying how,
during the stint of father Sir Ashutosh and son Shyama Prasad, marks of
relatives were tampered with and how the dread of such dirty practices compelled
many a brilliant candidate to drop certain years of exam as some relations of
the Mukherjee family too had appeared for these exams.
In Bengal what remained a prolonged contradiction
between the Hindu zamindars and Muslim peasants assumed a communal character
fanned by the deliberate efforts of the communalists. Later in his life Shyam
Prasad consistently, openly sided with the Hindu zamindars. After the communal
award the Hindu domination in the Bengal legislature dwindled in favour of the
Muslims. On 27 December 1939 the Hindu Maha Sabha emerged in Bengal through the
hoisting of the saffron flag at the Wellington Square in Calcutta by Savarkar,
Shyam Prasad remaining his main assistant. This event delighted the British
colonial power. An elated governor of Bengal, who was present in Calcutta, shot
off a letter to Zetland, the head of the Indian state, which read "Gradually
emerging and with considerable vigour, as something approaching a political
force, (they) have just held a monster-meeting here (in Calcutta) from which
there has emerged a series of resolutions highly communal in character and
condemnatory of the Congress. I will not be surprised, things being as they are,
if the Maha Sabha were to succeed, in stealing a certain amount of Congress
thunder." (Zetland Collection, IOLR, MSSEUR D/609/19)
One researcher, Jaya Chatterjee, in her book
Bengal Divided noted such revealing facts that "Big business was the
first to switch its allegiance. Calcutta’s wealthy Marwari families handsomely
donated to the Maha Sabha’s coffers, and Jugal Kishore Birla, whose family in
the past had underwritten many Congress ventures, headed the list of donors, who
financed the Maha Sabha conference in Calcutta. Also on the list were Seth
Banshidhar Jalan, Badridas Goenka and Radhakissen Konodia, while Khaitan and
company made generous contributions." (Memo dated 3rd December, 1939, GB, SB
`PH’ series, File No. 501/39 (III)
The Hindu zamindars came forward in large numbers
to give shape to the Hindu Maha Sabha in Bengal. We learn from the same source
the names of the Hindu zamindars who funded the Maha Sabha for the above
meeting.
When the communal flare-up was assuming menacing
dimensions Shyam Prasad wrote in his diary on 4 January, 1946 that
"Force must in the last analysis be met with force.
An internal policy of non-resistance to armed violence would eventually condemn
any society to dissolution."
As a consistent communalist this educated Brahmin
leader naturally gave the clarion call from the Sabha’s Tarakeswar Session to
fashion the Hindustan National Guard with the membership strength of one and
half lakh.
Arun Jetley, the BJP minister at the centre,
recently fulminated against the communists for their role during the Quit India
Movement in 1942. It is true the CPI leadership abandoned any struggle against
British imperialism and mortgaged the ideology of revolutionary Marxism to the
colonial masters with a one-sided approach to the people’s war during World War
II. But the rabid anti-communist elements of the BJP do not unmask the leaders
like Shyam Prasad Mukherjee.
Mukherjee wrote a letter to the Bengal Governor on
26 July 1942 suggesting measures against the Quit India Movement. The noted
historian Ramesh Chandra Mazumdar wrote that "Shyam Prasad ended the letter
with a discussion of the mass movement organised by the Congress. He expressed
the apprehension that the movement would create internal disorder and will
endanger internal security during the war by exciting popular feeling and he
opined that any government in power has to suppress it, but that according to
him could not be done only by persecution.... In that letter he mentioned item
wise the steps to be taken for dealing with the situation .... " (Ramesh Ch.
Mazumdar, History of Modern Bengal, Part II, pp 350-351)
In Kashmir the Maharaja Hari Singh, the descendent
of the British stooge Gulam Singh who betrayed Ranjit Singh during the
British-Sikh war and received the safe throne of Kashmir, decided not to join
either of the two dominions, India and Pakistan on 15 August 1947, By the year
1952 on 26 July Nehru and popular leader Sheikh Abdullah signed the memorandum
of accession to India agreeing to separate citizenship, a separate flag, the
right to frame ones own laws and to elect ones own president through the Kashmir
Constituent Assembly, displacing the hereditory power of the Maharaja. Shyam
Prasad had by then set up the Hindu communal party, the Jan Sangh. He nurtured a
never-ending grudge against Sheikh Abdullah who replaced the Hindu Maharaja Hari
Singh. When Nehru inducted him into his ministry, Shyam Prasad seized the
occasion to train his guns on Sheikh Abdullah. He wrote to Sheik Abdullah "I
don’t know intimately about your past, but I have seen some papers and documents
stated as leader of a communist party. Even important British officers expressed
their unconcealed anxiety to utilise you and your movement for bringing about
the end of a Hindu Maharaja Rule." [Cited in Ramen Das, Shyam Prasad ki
Sampradaik Chhilen, (Was Shyam Prasad, Communal ?) Page 67]
It was intolerable for Shyam Prasad to adjust
himself to the two identities, communist and Muslim, of Sheikh Abdullah. It was
but natural for him to stretch his mind too far to use the communist tag against
Sheik Abdullah for his fulmination against the pernicious policies of the
Majaraja and then the Nehru regimes. Shyam Prasad and his party, the Jan Sangh,
did not accept the privileges gained by the Kashmiri people through their
prolonged struggles. In 1953 while the Jan Sangh opposed the plebiscite in
Kashmir, the Praja Parishad formed by the RSS workers violently stood for one
country, one rule, rejecting the privileges gained by the Kashmiri people. On 26
June 1953 Shyam Prasad was arrested by the Sheikh Abdullah government when he
had entered Kashmir to extend support to the Praja Parishad movement. He died in
jail. In brief, it is the life sketch of the social scum, lackey of British
imperialism and communalist careerist Shyam Prasad Mukherjee. Shyam Prasad too
expressed his own analysis of himself in his diary that he had committed many a
sin in his life, taking recourse to falsehood solely for temporary felicity. [Shyam
Prasad’s Diary (in Bengali) page 52]. This sums up the real character of the
father of the Jan Sangh, that re-incarnated itself as the Bharatiya Janata Party
in the late 70s.
BJP’s Fake
Decentralisation
The BJP’s pretense of de-centralisation of power
is a hoax. It views the formation of smaller states, not as a process of the
decentralisation and devolution of power locally, but as a more effective
administrative mechanism with which to control the people.
In fact, in the last few months it has sought the
further centralisation of power in the hands of the centre in all spheres —
fiscal, cultural and political.
In the fiscal sphere, the Eleventh Finance
Commission, while maintaining the meagre allocations to the states; it has
given new powers to the centre to withold grants to any state, if it does not
effectively implement its programmes. In education it seeks a hegemonistic
Hindutva curriculum crushing the rich local realities, and promoting English
and Hindi at the cost of the mother tongue.
In the sphere of politics, the BJP has, of late
made a desperate bid to increase the powers of the Home Ministry in the
states. On June 28, the Home Minister convened a meeting of Chief Secretaries
and police chiefs of all states, to push through legislation "to regulate
the centre’s intervention in Law and Order in the states", and for this
purpose "the transfer of the subjects ‘Police’ and ‘Public Order’ from the
State List to the Concurrent List" involving Article 355 of the
Constitution. This attempt failed due to opposition from the states.
|