CPM:

An Imperialist Agent in Pro-people Garb

Globalization and ‘Left’ Front Government — A Fact-sheet

Suvrajit

 

Previous Chapter  Contents  Next Chapter

 

Anti-Labour Policies

Imperialist and big business capital wants to extract profits, super-profits. Hence, they carry on production through labour-saving technology. The main theme today has become jobless growth. In this aspect how far is it possible that their capital investment will be translated into sizeable employment opportunities? Actually Buddhadeb pretends to be in the era of the first phase of capitalism when there was scope for huge employment opportunities. That was the progressive era of capitalism. But now in the era of imperialism it is not possible. Let’s hear from the horse’s mouth "that increasing international competition and free-wheeling capital will not only cut jobs, but will effectively wipe whole nations and regions off the economic map. It understands that scenario of workers’ fortunes worldwide. Converging is less likely than growing divergence. In brief, globalisation offers opportunities, but also exacerbates risks.’’ (World Bank, 1995, p.124) Still then, Buddha a ‘simpleton’, a happy-go-lucky man is inviting foreign and domestic big business houses luring them with incentives. We will now trace the facts as to how far the employment scenario of West Bengal will be brightened by these steps?

Before discussing the same, let us explain the prospective of the West Bengal labour scenario. In 1991 employment in the manufacturing sector was 7.75 lakhs, a negative growth rate of 25.81%. The service sector, hotel etc. shows a positive trend. In 1991 the employment in this sector was 0.32 lakhs while in 2001 the employment in the said sector was 0.37 lakhs, a positive growth rate of 15.62%.24

This signifies a grave situation for Bengal. The government of West Bengal, at this juncture, is implementing the policies of liberalisation to tide over the above stated unemployment problem. But as per the liberalisation policies, labourers are the most hit. Flexibility of labour is a pre-requisite condition for imperialist capital vis-a-vis the ongoing crisis management measures. The dominant theme of imperialist capital is that labour flexibility leads to economic growth, which in turn creates new jobs. According to the OECD (Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development) the flexibility of labour takes five main forms: 25

(1) External numerical flexibility: number of employees adjusted in accordance with the employer’s needs.

(2) Externalisation: Part of the firm’s work is put out through sub-contracting.

(3) Internal numerical flexibility: working hours and their ‘delivery’ is adjusted according to the employer’s need.

(4) Functional flexibility: Worker’s jobs modified according to employer’s needs.

(5) Wages flexibility: Labourer’s reward according to productivity and market condition.

The flexibility of labour implies a smaller workforce, fewer rules in the workplace, weaker unions etc.

Thus flexibility of wages is upheld by the imperialist’s conclave as the panacea of all capitalism’s problems, in particular of employment opportunities. If the masters show the way, how can its pet lag behind? The CPI(M) has opened the floodgate to domestic and foreign investors. But what is its result? The private sector, though it registered a growth rate of 8.02% during the year 1999-2001, the growth of employment opportunities shows a negative growth rate of 12.95%.26 The government is touring throughout the globe. It has signed a number of MOUs, of which a percentage is really invested. But the labour-saving industries like infotech or food-tech etc., ie. the much hyped industries, shows a dismal figure in terms of employment scope. The table below testifies this fact.

Year

 Capital invested in industries (in lakhs)

 Employment numbers

 Employment per lakh invested

1980-81

 4,17,741

 9,50,026

 2.28

1985-86

 63,78,331

 8,06,434

 1.26

1990-91

 12,51,767

 7,40,980

 0.59

1991-96

 30,87,549

 8,25,154

 0.27

1998-99

 17, 21,524

 6,85,108

 0.16

Source: Labour in West Bengal, Department of Labour and Paschimbanga: Anya Chokhe. Compiled in Prasanga Sramik booklet published by Nagarik Mancha.

Moreover, in 2001, 412 new factories were established employing 40 new labourers per factory. In the same year 325 companies were shut down retrenching 456 workers per factory27.From all aspects, the tall claims of the government of West Bengal are dashed to the ground. Still Buddhadeb Bhattacharya and his party are chanting the slogan of privatisation! Not only this, the CPI(M) is also there to safeguard the interests of private and imperialist capital. It is acting like a reliable watch-dog to look after the peaceful profit extraction of the business houses. Consequently they are appeasing the business houses, and are assuring them of guaranteed return!

The Left front government’s acts remind us of the faithful, Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) of multinational corporations. The Bengal chief minister, on repeated occasions is accusing the militant trade union movement as the sole cause to prevent industries from operating. This, according to him, subsequently leads to loss of man days, ie. Employment! But the table below shows a different picture. It shows man days lost due to lockouts far outweigh the loss due to strikes.

Year

   Lockout

  Strike

 Total Lockouts & Strikes

number

 mandays lost %

 number

 mandays lost %

 nos

 mandays lost (lakh)

 1995

 136

 80.8

 33

 19.2

 169

 65.0

1996

 144

 85.66

 17

 13.76

 161

 121.4

1999

 161

 92.49

 29

 7.51

 190

 82.6

1998

 213

 98.10

 25

 1.90

 238

 115.7

1999

 264

 82.00

 34

 18.00

 298

 216.7

2000

 286

 83.78

 27

 16.22

 313

 191.7

2001

 305

 93.53

 20

 6.47

 325

 211.7

Source: Labour in West Bengal - 2001

Even then, who cares? On December 13, 2003, in the presence of as many as 80 top industrialists of India, the West Bengal chief minister categorically said that his government shall not hesitate to resort to lathis if the workers movement crosses the limits.28 He also begged apology for the CPI(M)’s past mistakes, which translates the 26 years’ rule for them in West Begal! Buddhadeb exclaimed that, ‘‘We gheroed in 67-69, that was a mistake. Gherao is not the path of the workers movement,... gherao cannot be the path of the workers’ movement. Fighting-clashes cannot be the path.’’29

The industrial houses may render mercy to the CPI(M) and Co., but will the martyrs forgive them? The martyr workers of Hindmotors or other factories who laid down their lives; who had sacrificed their yesterdays for these nymphs’ cozy life and utter surrender!

The Chief Minister further added that, ‘‘Democratic trade union movements, demonstrations, rallies, strikes are legal rights. Who can take away these rights? Nobody can take away the rights.’’30 Which is your real face? What you said at the business conclave, or what you explained at your party meet? Yes, Mr. Bhattacharya, nobody can take away the rights earned through the movements. The red banner that your party hails is stained with the blood of so many martyrs. Hence please dare not take away the rights of the trade union movement on one pretext or other. Refrain from appeasing the court by stating that your government will enact laws to curb rallies or processions. Justice Amitava Lala’s recent order of banning rallies or processions is an exccuse for the CPI(M) to come down with more draconian measures.

The West Bengal government is planning to enact a law in the coming winter session, namely the Special Economic Zone Bill 2003. In the bill it is proposed to ban any type of militant strike, demonstration or sudden demonstration. The government has also planned to increase the number of special economic zones or export processing zones in different corners of Bengal (Haldia, North Bengal etc). Now, in the changed situation, the CPI(M) is creatively applying Marxism so that very soon Bengal becomes a peaceful oasis to the investors. They have perfected the art of betrayal. Let us cite a representative example!

On July 28, 2003 employees of Wimco went on strike after the management dismissed eight workers, and suspended and chargesheeted 16 others on disciplinary grounds. The deadlock failed to be solved even after three tripartite meetings held at the Labour Commissioner’s office at the New Secretariat. At last the chief minister intervened. In a meeting held by the special secretary to the chief minister, S.A. Ahmed, at the Writers’ Building the leaders of the CITU and INTUC agreed to call off the strike. The suspension of 16 employees were called off, but the sacked workers were not taken back. This type of classic surrender of the workers cause in West Bengal, courtesy the CPI(M), is very much evident.(Source: ‘Sramik Andolon’, the monthly organ of CITU, September 2003) The left front government led by the CPI(M) is now not concerned about the retrenched workers, but about pursuing them for a VRS scheme. The Bengal chief minister expressed that, ‘‘if factories are to shut down then we have to decide about our future course of action on the basis of discussions with the workers. We cannot tell them that you all get lost. Or tell them about VRS etc. We have to take the social responsibility to save them.’’31 But, on the contrary the CPI(M) forced the workers to take VRS. Recently, the Mulajore workers of CESC, owned by the Goenkas were forced to take VRS, even distorting the CPI(M) consent and the supreme court’s verdict.32 (The matter will be dealt in detail in the power chapter). Not only this, the government is seeking a fund from the imperialist funding agency, DFID, to implement VRS in the sick industries. The DFID has sanctioned, until 4th September 2003, Rs. 18 crores with a right to supervision of two government institutions to facilitate VRS. More conditional funds are to trickle down in future. Mr. Bhattacharya what about your slogan of sovereignty?

The CPI(M)-led government, in a recent bid for disinvestment of the public sector units, have expressed that it is ‘‘open to manpower restructuring and waiver of outstanding liabilities to ensure sustainable viability of these units.’’12 Dear reader, can you hear the foot-steps of OECD which expressed what it means by labour flexibility, the pre-requisite for globalisation!

The Imperialism-CPI(M) nexus is very much evident. Still Mr. Bhattacharya will express that they are not surrendering! Then what is it? It’s not fun but a crude joke to the teaming multitudes. The CPI(M) is not callous to the social security measures of the workers. It consciously goes against the issue. The Central labour minister recently announced to freeze the PF(Provident Fund) and other social security measures in the special economic zone areas. The days are not far off when the Bengal government, like other states, will follow the centre with regard to the above said measures. But at the same time will dupe the people by telling the story of ‘compulsion’. The surrender before the imperialists and big business is sure not to be limited in those special economic zones alone, because there is no Chinese wall in between other areas and the special economic zones of Bengal!

In 1999-2000 though there were 267.32 lakhs employee eligible for PF only 23.35 lakhs are registered as EPF members.33 The CPM-backed bureaucracy, meant to look into the affair, is busy taking bribes from the business houses.

Moreover the West Bengal government from 2nd April, 1998 started a ‘scheme for financial assistance to the workers in locked out industrial units’. In that scheme, the workers of the closed units get Rs. 500/- per month as a dole. Now, the government has stopped the said scheme due to "scarcity of funds".

Not only this, the business houses evade PF dues, thereby depriving the workers of their legitimate demands. In 2000-01 and 2001-02, Rs. 309.2 crores and Rs. 296.8 crores are the dues owed by the business houses. Till 2002, 164.06 crores is due from the jute-mill owners in the PF account.34 Though there are provisions of stringent legal measures against the defaulter business houses with regard to PF, they are moving freely in the ‘oasis’ of West Bengal guarded by the CPI(M) and its partners. With the government defaulting for the same reason, how can it penalise others? In the Bengal government owned jute-mills, the PF due is to the tune of Rs.22.89 crores in the year 2002.35

ESI is an insurance guaranteed medical benefit for the workers. The business houses are to deposit the amount. But only in 2002, the ESI amount due was Rs.155.04 crores.36 Till now, only in 8 districts out of 17 districts; workers are covered under the ESI scheme.37 Even the workers do not receive compensation for professional diseases. In West Bengal 620 factories, notified as ‘red’, are dangerous from the perspective of workers’ health. There, thousand of workers are involved. But, in 1999 and 2000, compensation was received by 9 and 17 workers respectively. In 2001 there were no workers who received compensation.38 Such is the seriousness of the ‘pro-people government’ committed to the workers’ health!

The left front as per their election promise of 1977, promised unemployment dole to the registered unemployed youths. The left front government started collecting proffessional tax from service-holders to collect funds for this purpose. But, the monthly unemployment dole of Rs. 100 is now stopped. A new scheme for a one-time unemployment dole has been introduced. Consequently in this scheme the government, which collects Rs. 288 crore from professional tax, gives/distributes Rs. 14 crore (approx) to the registered unemployed youth.30 The benevolent scheme started on the ground that employed persons will contribute a meager amount of their income to heal the pain of the unprivileged unemployed youth, to an extent. But the amount of money collected has become a source of income to the CPI(M). It is like a Bengali story written by Parashuram, a famous writer, where in a temple everywhere there is money — sometimes in the form of donation, sometimes in the form begging. whatever be the form, the temple, authority cuts the devotees pockets on any excuse.

The 2nd labour commision of 2002 of the central government seems to drag society towards a classic fascist set up, where everything is at the whims of the imperialists and the big business houses. The CPI(M) is an important ally in this regard. They disagree with the central government’s proposal only to agree on the next day! This holds true with regard to the 2nd labour commission report as well.

In the inter-state council meeting held is Srinagar is August 2003 there was a discussion regarding contractual employment.40 Andhra Pradesh chief minister, Chandrababu Naidu, pointed to the ‘success’ of the scheme which he has introduced in the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation. Naidu said, government employees would work only if their jobs were made contractual. The West Bengal chief minister said that the wage bills of government employees in most states were increasing so much that they had become unmanageable, though Bhattacharya cleverly did not say anything on the issue raised by Chandrababu Naidu.

On the contrary the comments of Mr. Bhattachareya has resemblance with the 2nd labour commission’s observation: over-manned organization are also a cause of poor work-culture. "When the number of hands recruited exceeds the optimum requirement for efficiency, it lowers the normal level of work efficiency and the work hours per employee. Workers then have to fritter along. One has only to visit a government office to see this situation." (para 5.19 of 2nd labour commission — compiled in ‘Marxist’, the theoretical quarterly of the CPI(M), volume XVIII: 3-4, July- December, 2002) The ‘left’ chief minister is on the same side of the reactionary arguments of the NDA government. Actually this argument which ultimately concludes in downsizing, and the contractual system devoid of any social securities. Consequently it can be safely concluded that sooner or later, today or tommorrow, Bengal led by the left front will follow the labour reforms framed by the centre. Of course, in the same inter-state council meeting Mr. Bhattacharya stated for not downsizing but rationalisation, the other name for anti-labour ‘rationalised’ steps.

Let us see one example of rationalisation of the IISCO glass factory at Kulti. The factory was declared shut down in April 2003. 380 temporary and 2500 permanent staff were retrenched. The former received no facility and the later were forced to opt for VRS (voluntary retirement scheme). The company is shut down in a planned way.

The factory, was shown to have losses while other private factories like Electro-steel of Khardah and Kalinga Pipe have standard profit in the business. Actually backward technology and corrupt management made this unit sick in a planned way.

The CPI(M) on the one hand opposes the 2nd Labour Commission and on the other implements the provisions of the 2nd Labour Commission recommendation of the NDA government.

In line with the 2nd labour commission in 2002 there was a tripartite agreement in the jute industry. There, wage is related to productivity to the extent of 67%-33%. The ‘vouchers’, ‘vagawallas’— contract labourers are settled to receive Rs. 100 per day and thereby the system is legalised. Moreover in the jute factories run by Arun Bajoria or Wardha, wage is related to productivity by 100%.

The State government has planned to go for a joint venture in the coal sector. A state government organisation, the Mineral Development and Trading Corporation (MDTC) has explored good quality coal. The government, in order to have business, is going for joint ventures with private houses. It is implementing contract production defying and negating the workers voice of protest. The CPI(M), in order to carry on the contractual system has even removed its local CITU leadership from its post for his opposition to the said system .

The ‘left’ government, trailing behind the business houses by the way it is carrying on the informalisation of industry, one of the basic objectives of globalisation, is very thought-provoking. In 1992 the West Bengal government took on lease from the central government two mines as captive mines for the West Bengal State Electricity Board and the West Bengal Power Development Corporation. These undertakings formed a joint venture company with Emta, a private sector enterprise. The entire management is controlled by the private sector. About four thousand workers toil in the mines and load coal on to railway wagons which carry it to power companies. But the company has not a single worker on its roll. A number of contractors supply workers who are made to work much more than usual hours in inhuman condition, have no security of jobs, are given the lowest possible wage for the day they are engaged, and are deprived of all usual benefits.41 The legal machinery of the government even refuses the union rights as per law. The government has also many other feathers in its cap. It passed a law by which workers are entitled to elect their own union by secret ballot. In this case also the CPI(M) and Congress combined at the behest of the state government, to oppose union elections for many years at the Hindustan Lever, in Kolkata.

Thus in each and every aspect, the government of West Bengal is in the service of the comprador-bureaucratic and imperialist capital. Labour/working class — the vanguards are forced to be backbenchers, to be under a defeatist mentality, to be betrayed and deprived of their economic and democratic rights for the long 26 years. It is an important key to the ‘left’s success to become right reactionary.

Previous Chapter  Contents  Next Chapter

 

 Top

 

 

Home  |  Current Issue Archives  |  Revolutionary Publications  |  Links  |  Subscription