Trying to encash on
the stock market boom before the Harshad Mehta scam, the then Finance Minister
Mr Manmohan Singh had said "The Stock market is responding to the economic
reforms". But in no time he retracted after the scam was exposed and the
stock market crashed and said " the Stock market is no indicator of the
economy and I can’t loose my sleep over stock market". This is the typical
response of our policy makers. They take credit for things as long as it suits
them and disown them the moment they are not moving in their favour.
A similar approach is
being taken towards the huge foreign exchange reserves, amounting to US $126
billion, with the government of India. The foreign exchange reserves with the
RBI are steeply increasing from the time the present phase of new economic
reforms were launched during the Narasimha Rao-Manomohan Singh time. In 1989 our
foreign exchange reserves touched rock bottom. They had fallen to a level that
could barely last fourteen days and the Government of India had to pledge its
gold with the Bank of England to borrow foreign exchange to buy essential
imports. After embarking on to this present phase of new economic policies under
the auspices of the IMF and World Bank combine, the foreign exchange reserves
have been rising continuously. The improvement in the foreign exchange reserves
from a bare minimum level (equivalent to two weeks of imports), to the present
US $126 billion level (which can last for more than 26 months) is repeatedly
claimed by successive governments as their achievement. They are trying to sell
this as a success story of the liberalization-privatization-globalization
policies. But can be this be said to be a success story? Can this be called an
achievement? No it can’t. If we go into the sources and composition of these
foreign exchange reserves we will come to know that there is nothing to feel
great about it and on the other hand we are paying heavy price for sitting on
such reserves.
In the present day of
global trade, exports and imports of goods and services are essential for every
country. For carrying out trade between two countries each country must have a
currency acceptable to both. The currency of one country will not be acceptable
to the other country unless either there is a special trade agreement between
the two countries like the one India has with Nepal and the erstwhile Soviet
Union or there is a common currency between them like the EURO in the European
Union countries. Because of its superpower status and also because of its large
share in the world trade the US dollar has emerged as the most acceptable
currency of the world. Apart from this, SDRs (Special Drawing Rights a currency
of the IMF) and gold are also acceptable as a medium of exchange in world trade.
Every country must maintain a reserve in the form of these currencies for buying
imports. These reserves are known as foreign exchange reserves and will become
an asset in the central bank of the respective countries. So foreign exchange
reserves means the amount held by the government or the central bank of a
country (RBI in the case of India) in the form of US dollars, SDRs and gold. In
India at the end of December 2004, the RBI was having foreign exchange reserves
of US $126 billion comprising of gold reserves of US $4.352 billion and SDR of
US $5 billion and the rest is foreign currency assets.
Apart from the export
and import of goods and services, capital will also move across countries as
investment. This capital moving across countries will also become an important
source of foreign exchange reserves.
In a nutshell,
foreign exchange, required by any country, can be earned by it from its exports,
from returns (either in the form of interest or profits) on its investment in
other countries and it will be spent for buying the imports and for paying
capital liabilities. Any country whose earnings are more than its spending can
accumulate foreign exchange reserves and such accumulation will represent the
sound financial health of that country and any country with surplus foreign
exchange can feel proud of its reserves. Can this be the case with India? No it
is not. Because India always had trade deficits, which means its imports are
always more than its exports. The returns on India’s investments abroad are
negligible when compared to its debt payments. In such a case how India has
managed to pile up such large foreign exchange reserves is interesting to know.
Our foreign exchange
reserves are bulging not because of our earnings from exports but because of
borrowings and inflow of foreign capital. Thanks to economic reforms pursued by
successive governments to please the international lenders like the IMF, World
Bank and other financial institutions there is a regular flow of foreign capital
into the country both as debt and as investment. This is what is making our
foreign exchange reserves increase. The huge foreign exchange reserves we have
is not an asset because it is not created from our earnings but a liability that
has emerged out of the foreign capital inflow into the country. The ruling
classes are cleverly suppressing this fact and trying to portray rosy picture of
this liability. Our present Prime Minister during his previous tenure as finance
minister already redefined the word "self sufficiency" as "having
enough foreign exchange reserves to pay for the imports" by conveniently
ignoring the source of foreign exchange reserves. Going by this definition,
India with so much foreign exchange reserves can easily be called a "self-sufficient
economy".
Now let us try to
understand the exact position of the foreign exchange reserves, its composition
and the costs associated with it. As is mentioned above, India always had trade
deficits (our export of goods and services are always less than import of goods
and services). And this gap has been increasing day by day. Even in the current
year our exports and imports for the period April to September are US$ 34,451
million and US $ 51,892 million respectively resulting in a deficit of US
$17,441 million.
The following table
of Foreign Trade will further highlight this point.
India’s Foreign Trade
(in US $ million)
Year |
Export |
Import |
Balance
|
1993-94 |
22,238 |
23,306 |
-1,068 |
1994-95 |
26,331 |
28,654 |
-2,324 |
1995-96 |
31,795 |
36,675 |
-4,880 |
1996-97 |
33,470 |
39,132 |
-5,663 |
1997-98 |
35,006 |
41,184 |
-6,478 |
1998-99 |
33,219 |
42,389 |
-9,170 |
1999-00 |
36,822 |
49,671 |
-12,848 |
2000-01 |
44,560 |
50,536 |
-5,976 |
2001-02 |
43,827 |
51,413 |
-7,587 |
2002-03 |
52,719 |
61,412 |
-8,693 |
2003-04 |
63,843 |
78,149 |
-14,307 |
(Source
: RBI bulletin)
So trade is a drain
and not a source for foreign exchange reserves. The other source left for
foreign exchange reserves is capital inflows into the country. As long as
international finance capital finds India as an attractive place to earn profits
it will flow into the country and our foreign exchange reserves will continue to
swell, and the moment they feel the other way, this inflow will be stopped and
the so called strong external sector will burst like a bubble. The foreign
capital inflow can be either in the form of investment in setting up of
industries here, which is called FDI (Foreign Direct Investment), or in the form
of pure speculation in the stock market which is called FIIs (Foreign
Institutional Investment) or in the form of deposits by the NRIs (Non Resident
Indians).
As for FDI, it is an
equity for which we need not pay interest, but there will be an outflow in the
form of profits, royalty, technical fee etc. The only advantage of this form of
foreign capital over the other forms is that it is a long-term investment and
comparatively more stable and can’t be withdrawn overnight and hence not
volatile. Yet most of it goes to swallow up indegenouas capital and bring high
technology displacing labour. Where as the foreign capital in the form FIIs is
purely on speculation and they will not have any productive purpose. Moreover it
is more volatile and moves very fast. They will always be on the look out for
short term profits and move fast wherever they see an immediate profit. This can
be withdrawn overnight leaving the country bankrupt as they have done in
Malaysia and many other countries.
With the huge amounts
of their investment they are capable of manipulating the stock market to their
advantage. They push the market to an artificial level, lure the small
investors, and then offload their stocks making big profits that allow the stock
market to collapse leaving the small investors bankrupt. They can push the
market to whatever level they want. This is what is happening in our stock
market for so many years.
The flow of money
from FIIs has been rapidly increasing in the recent past. The net equity
purchased by FIIs increased to $3.1 billion, $6.6 billion and $8.5 billion
respectively in 2002, 2003 and 2004 respectively. The cumulative stock of FIIs
investment totals $30.3 billion which is 8% of the total market capitalization
at the Bombay Stock Exchange which is around $383.6 billion. But even with this
small portion they account for the 38.4% of the transactions at BSE. Another
significant fact is that the hold of total foreign capital on India’s top 50
companies has increased from 18% in 2001 to 22% in 2002 and to 30% at the end of
2004. Further if we consider only free floating shares, or shares normally
available for trading, the average holding of FIIs will be about 36%. From this
it is easy to realize that the sensex is driven neither by the economic
fundamentals nor by the profitability of the companies nor by the dividends they
give, but only by the outlook of these FIIs. The recent example is that even
after such a devastating tragedy of tsunami, which struck on 26th December, the
stock market kept on rising and reached record levels. After reaching a record
high of 6679 on January 3, 2005 the stock market suddenly collapsed loosing 316
points in a single day on January 5 draining around Rs 60,000 crores from the
market. This is not because of any economic reasons, as there is no substantial
change in the "fundamentals", but because FIIs offloaded their stocks to book
profits.
In case of NRI
deposits the government has to pay high interest on these deposits. The present
level of interest on these dep-osits is between 2.5% to 4.5% depen-ding on the
currency and the tenure. With other concessions it is in fact much higher and
well above international rates of interest.
Another source of
foreign currency is borrowings by government, Corporates, Banks and other
financial institutions which is known as ECBs (External Commercial Borrowings)
at commercial rates and the interest rates will range from 5% to 7%.
On the other hand,
the RBI would be investing these reserves in the central banks of other
countries where it would be earning interest between 1.5% to 2%. Presently the
RBI has invested about US $ 30 billions. It means the RBI is paying 4% interest
on the deposits and earning only 2% interest. Hence there is a net out flow of
2% on these foreign exchange reserves. The more reserves we have the more cost
we have to pay.
Another significant
aspect of our foreign exchange reserves is its composition. The following table
of foreign capital inflows into our country will give us the clear picture about
the nature of the foreign exchange reserves.
FOREIGN INVESTMENT INFLOWS
(US $million)
|
1999-00 |
2000-01 |
2001-02 |
2002-03 |
2003-04
|
FDI |
2,155 |
2,400 |
4,095 |
2,764 |
2,387 |
Portfolio investment(FIIs) |
3,026 |
2,760 |
2,021 |
979 |
1,1377 |
NRI deposits outstanding as at end of March |
21,684 |
23,072 |
25,174 |
28,529 |
33,266 |
From the above table
we can see that in spite of their best efforts and many incentives the ruling
classes are not able to attract FDI in significant portion. And what we are
getting is either highly volatile portfolio investment from FIIs and high cost
deposits from the NRIs. So India’s piling up of foreign exchange reserves
instead of giving comfort to its external sector is a burden on the country and
economy. The large funds from FIIs is going to make India a vulnerable hot spot
in the global market.
Who is going to feel
great about such foreign exchange reserves which are not earned but a borrowed?
Only the comprador ruling classes and servants of global capital can feel happy
about this. Patriotic Indians can’t allow such and undesirable and unwanted
burden on their heads. Like the foreign debt the foreign exchange reserves would
be confiscated by any people’s government when it seizes power.
|