In 1998, after a
series of military victories by the FARC-EP, the United States government
considerably increased its military aid to Colombia. Military funding tripled
from $89 million in 1997 to $289 million in 1998. This funding included advanced
Black Hawk attack helicopters and sophisticated intelligence equipment. The
United States is Colombia’s largest trading partner and principal arms supplier.
In December 1998, the Clinton administration announced plans to build a joint
U.S.-Colombian military base in Colombia. The U.S. also began to train an elite
1,000-troop counterinsurgency battalion, using trainers from the elite U.S. "Green
Berets." The U.S. admits to having between 200 and 300 combat troops in
Colombia at any one time.
In June 2000, the
U.S. Congress passed a $1.3 billion military aid bill. Ninety percent of those
funds were to go to Colombia’s armed forces and police. The bill provided 42
Huey and 18 Black Hawk helicopters, along with Special Forces training for two
more elite combat units. The main objective of the aid package is the "push
into the South," a FARC-EP stronghold. The Colombian resistance forces and
struggling people call the package a "declaration of war."
The U.S. aid package
is part of a massive $7.5 billion program called "Plan Colombia." This
plan, drawn up by Washington and articulated by President Pastrana, is a rescue
package for Colombia’s ruling elite. Its centerpiece is the U.S. military aid.
The European Union, Japan, and other countries are asked to provide economic aid
for the corrupt Colombian government.
The said aims of Plan
Colombia
There are five main
goals to the Plan Colombia as outlined by Colombia’s President Pastrana. These
are: advancing the peace process, improving the economy, combating narcotics,
reforming the Judicial system and promoting human rights, and supporting
democratization and social development. Overall Plan Colombia is a $7.5 billion
package, $4.9 billion of which Colombia is providing itself mainly from
international financial institutions and Colombian government general revenues.
The House of Representatives met on March 9, 2000 and approved the Plan
Colombia, which allocates $1.337 billion from US funds. This new assistance from
the US will make Colombia the third largest recipient of US military aid after
Israel and Egypt.
In the Colombian
scheme of things the main group responsible for drug eradication prior to plan
Colombia were the National Police. With the election of President Pastrana in
1998 a shift began in US policy, which favored the Colombian military in waging
the drug war. The US argued that the Colombian military must be used to engage
the guerillas, as the production of coca is concentrated in the Caquetá and
Putumayo regions in the south of the country where the resistance movement, FARC,
has its strongholds. Gen. Charles Wilhelm, the head of the U.S. Southern
Command, argued that the Colombian National Police is only a police force and it
lacks the strength in numbers and combined arms capabilities that are required
to engage FARC fronts and mobile columns that possess army-like capabilities.
That this was a mission that "the armed forces and only the armed forces can
and should undertake." But the declared US position has been: "U.S
support for the Colombian military is targeted at reducing the flow of narcotics
and not against guerilla and paramilitary groups". According to it, it is
just a coincidence that coca cultivation is most prevalent in the areas where
FARC is situated. It thus makes sense to fight the guerillas and thus ease the
ability to interdict and destroy coca crops.
To this end the main
US/Colombian military initiatives have been the formation of a 950-man
counter-narcotics division and additional funding for another two divisions.
There has also been a $341 million aid program to upgrade radar facilities in
Colombia as well as extensive intelligence sharing on guerrilla activity in the
southern plains. The new riverine program will be used along the rivers on the
Ecuadorian border in southern Colombia.
In his speech on the
Plan the President Pastrana said, "And that’s why, for the first time, we
create a coherent, comprehensive program, called Plan Colombia, asking all the
international community to be involved in these programs, not only to fight
narcotics, the military side of narcotics or narco- trafficking, but also
alternative development. Most of the program that we want to invest in the Plan
Colombia wants to go really into implement policies on health, on structural
reforms, strengthening our institutions, human rights and alternative
development and social investment. We want to invest most of this money that
we’re asking for the international community in social development, because we
cannot solve only the problem looking at this as a military problem or a
policing aspect or the repression problem. We want to get into the real essence
of the problem: that is, bringing back to Colombia prosperity and health and
richness to our people, and that’s the way of eradicating drugs from our soil
and from our territory." He divided the ratio of the fund to be spent on
military and social aspect as 55:45. But the present figure stands at 85:15.
The money earmarked
for the "development" is to be used, as the US Government has hinted, on the
displaced people caused through the escalation of the counter insurgency war in
the Southern Plains. The peasants caught in the crossfire will be "moved to
places where they can find an alternative living at a reasonable rate with
government support." This is another way of saying that civilians caught in
the cross fire between the Colombian military and FARC rebels will be moved,
even forcibly, into areas of governmental control.
The US has asserted
that "Colombia must re-establish authority over narcotics producing
‘sanctuaries’ ...any comprehensive solution to Colombia’s problems must include
the re-establishment of government authority over these lawless areas." To
achieve this, it was proposed to establish a secure environment for GOC
officials and NGO’s to extend services to these "lawless zones." The
objective is clear: to wrest back control over the guerrilla held areas through
an all out war.
The above part of the
Colombia plan envisions a large-scale dislocation of the population during the
war. It is like setting up concentration camps as was done during the Vietnam
War and also in numerous other countries where forces of liberation were
fighting the colonialists during the sixties and seventies. It is also a part of
the plan that will deliver bombs and bread at the same time as was done in
Afghanistan to make the operation look like a humanitarian one.
To show that the US
cares for Human Rights the US senate has passed the Leahy Amendment whereby "all
assistance to the Colombian armed forces is contingent upon human rights
screening. No assistance will be provided to any unit of the Colombian military
for which there is credible evidence of serious human rights violations by its
members."
The Reality of "War on Drugs"
The U.S. and State
Department propagandists claim that the FARC-EP is involved in the cocaine
industry in Colombia. At the same time, it portrays the U.S. intervention in
Colombia as part of the "war on drugs."
The lie that "FARC-EP
is involved in the cocaine industry" was one time countered by no other
than the outgoing US lackey President Andres Pastrana himself. Even the U.S.
Drug Enforcement Agency admitted in an Aug. 1, 1999 interview with Bogota’s El
Tiempo that they had no evidence that the FARC-EP was involved with drug
trafficking.
The reality is, the
drug lords work hand in hand with the paramilitary death squads to fight the
FARC-EP and other guerrilla forces. In June 2000, the FARC-EP hosted a
conference in the zone on Illegal Drug Crops and the Environment. FARC-EP
spokesperson Raul Reyes put forward a far-reaching zone to demonstrate his
organization’s commitment to eradicating drugs with a pilot crop substitution
program in Cartegena de Chairá. Both the Colombian government and the U.S.
government opposed this program.
The reality is, the
biggest producers of coca and the manufacturers of cocaine are situated in the
northern part of the country where the most ruthless paramilitary units are
situated. Historically, they were formed by large landowners to protect
interests against guerrilla incursion and to suppress peasant demand for land
reform. The largest of the umbrella organization of Paramilitary units, AUC
(United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia) is headed by Carlos Castano, who
himself is a drug lord. These paramilitaries evolved into well-funded and
well-armed units responsible for over 70% of drug trafficking in Colombia. In
the cocaine producing industrial belt the paramilitaries are the strongest.
In the US, over
400,000 people died through cigarette and alcohol usage in 1987. All illegal
drugs combined including cocaine, angel dust, LSD, heroin, crack, and so on
killed 4,000 people and yet tobacco and alcohol cultivation and production are
not considered a threat. In fact, billions of dollars are spent by US
transnational tobacco firms to promote the consumption of tobacco throughout
the world, and particularly in the underdeveloped world. The facts of the
illegal drug related deaths are factored into drug war public speaking but the
facts of legal drug related deaths are ignored.
Even cocaine
production that finds its way into the US market, benefits the sprawling US
drug industry and not the peasants of Colombia who grow coca. They remain as
poor and oppressed as ever.
But Human Rights
Watch, a US based organisation which is close to the administration, has said
that there is extensive collaboration between Colombian regular army units and
paramilitaries, including the shared use of intelligence, weapons, vehicles,
medical aid and so on, many of the officers involved still remain on active
duty. There is collusion between the Colombian military and the paramilitary
networks in the assassination and intimidation of those involved in monitoring
human rights.
In fact Human rights
will be addressed primarily by securing a stable security environment; which
means it will be an appendage and an accessory to the overall military
operations that seek to destroy the guerrilla movement by declaring it a narco-guerrilla
organisation.
However, the "aid"
being made contingent to the behaviour of the security forces is a big state
fraud. Clinton himself dropped this binding by saying that as the "American
security interests are involved" this condition should not be followed while
aiding the Colombian security services. Bush on his part has tried to bypass
this condition by proposing to form new units to carry on the drug war. However,
these new units comprise men from the security forces units that are not
tainted. This entirely drops the promise to bring those responsible for
collusion to justice. A second change to the Leahy proposal is the fact that a
soldier from a ‘banned’ unit can still receive training if his personal record
is clean. If collusion were taking place on such a grand scale as outlined in
both the Human Right Watch and Amnesty Reports, and if investigations into the
collusion are frequently thwarted through threats, intimidation and violence
then it would seem logical to conclude that the vast majority of those who have
colluded have never been brought to justice. Even a CIA document admits that "officials
in Lima and Bogotá, if given anti-drug aid for counter-insurgency purposes,
would turn it to pure anti-guerrilla operations with little payoff against
trafficking." The human rights abuse issue in this way just becomes
redundant. The US military academy ‘School of Americas’ which is usually
termed as the "School of Assassins," based at Fort Benning, Georgia,
trains soldiers and military personnel from Latin American countries and they
are trained in the worst abuse of the Human Rights as they specialise in
sophisticated techniques of torture to squeeze out information. Colombia is one
of the single biggest senders of its security personnel to the school to be
trained in counter-insurgent warfare, anti-narcotics operations, military
intelligence and so on. There is clear evidence that at least "two hundred of
SOA Colombian graduates have gone on to perpetuate some of the most heinous
human rights abuses in Colombia."
Plan Colombia is exclusively military
in orientation. The "drug war" is merely a sham used to hide the counter
insurgency campaign waged by the Colombian military in the southern plains of
Colombia
Excerpts from:
Amnesty International Report 2001
[Though the
Amnesty International is an imperialist dominated organisation and it defends
the interests of the reactionary classes in an overall sense, yet many a times
it has to recognise the most heinous crimes of the ruling class forces the
world over as it becomes difficult to conceal them for ever. Or, those it
deems detrimental to the imperialist system as a whole. Here are some of the
AI observations.]
* Human rights
defenders, journalists, judicial officials, teachers, trade unionists and
leaders of Afro-Colombian and indigenous communities were among those
targeted. More than 4,000 people were victims of political killings, over 300
"disappeared," and an estimated 3,00,000 people were internally displaced. At
least 1,500 people were kidnapped by armed opposition groups and paramilitary
organizations; mass kidnaps of civilians continued.
* Torture - often
involving mutilation - remained widespread, particularly as a prelude to
murder by paramilitary groups. "Death squad"-style killings continued in urban
areas.
* Despite repeated
government promises to dismantle paramilitary forces, no effective action was
taken to curtail, much less to end, their widespread and systematic
atrocities.
* In February, 200
paramilitary gunmen raided the village of El Salado, Bolívar department,
killing 36 people, including a six-year-old child. Many victims were tied to a
table in the village sports field and subjected to torture, including rape,
before being stabbed or shot dead. Others were killed in the village church.
During the three-day attack, military and police units stationed nearby made
no effort to intervene.
* Over 40 people
were killed in November during an AUC attack on several fishing villages in
the municipality of La Ciénaga, Magdalena department. A further 30 people
reportedly "disappeared".
* Six children aged
between six and 15 on a school outing were shot dead by the army in August.
* Collusion between
the Colombian security forces, particularly the army, and paramilitary groups
continued and, indeed, strengthened.
* Journalists
investigating and publishing reports about human rights and political violence
were also targeted. Eight journalists were killed, mainly by paramilitary
forces, and many more received death threats or were kidnapped.
* Seven judicial
investigators "disappeared" following their abduction by paramilitary forces
in Cesar department in March. Six judicial officials were killed.
* However, the vast
majority of perpetrators of violations of human rights and international
humanitarian law continued to evade accountability. Despite numerous
outstanding arrest warrants, no attempt was made by the armed and security
forces to capture paramilitary leaders responsible for widespread human rights
violations.
* Paramilitary
leaders arrested by civilian judicial investigators, routinely escaped from
police or military detention.
. |