Volume 2, No. 11, November 2001

 

Indian Ruler’s Despicable Slavishness

— Suman
 

Never before in post-1947 India have the rulers of this country so shamelessly cringed before their imperialist bosses. Never before have they so blatantly offered our country — its land, its air bases, its armed forces and intelligence — for use by a foreign power. After the Sept. 11 attack, it cringed slavishly before their US masters, offering Indian facilities even before it was asked for. Before the reluctant Pakistan was forced into submission, the Indian rulers were frantically scrambling to join the US war wagon. The US expressed elation over the Indian response and even unofficially discussed with them the use of naval facilities. But, for the moment, in a military sense, gaining Pakistan’s support was more useful to the US in its war against Afghanistan. So, while the Indian rulers kept groveling in the American muck, hoping thereby to upstage Pakistan, besides rhetoric it could not offer that type of military assistance to fight the Taliban that Pakistan was capable of.

No self-respecting rulers of a supposedly sovereign country could possibly have been more servile than our present rulers in offering our country to the US for its unhindered use. India was among the first states to offer its military cooperation and the use of its strategic bases — even before the NATO did. Just two days after the bombing, the Cabinet Committee on Security Affairs met on Sept. 13 and decided "to offer all cooperation and facilities for any US military operation". Jaswant Singh said that this meant India would provide logistical help and/or a staging ground for US military operations. He went so far as to state that the offer to the US was "unconditional". The VHP, and important leaders of the BJP, such as Narendra Modi (now CM of Gujarat), spoke of the "historic opportunity" to act as America’s main "anti-terrorism" ally. The Indian rulers desperately sought to become a forward-line state in America’s new war.

This was not all. India’s Home Minister, L.K.Advani, repeatedly emphasized India’s close links with Israel in the fight against terrorism. He reiterated the government’s offer of bases and logistical support to the US. In fact, at the very time of the Sept. 11 attack, the Israeli National Security Advisor, Major General Dayan, was visiting India to participate in the Indo-Israel Security dialogue, with a view to deepen the involvement of Israel’s secret service, Mossad, in India’s internal security, and to develop the military cooperation between the two countries.

Unfortunate for the Indian rulers, its game plan did not work as it hoped. It expected that with its blind servility to US war plans it would outdo Pakistan in the new ‘coalition’. But, Pakistan support was an absolute necessity to the US if any war was to be waged against Afghanistan. Its long and deep relations with the Taliban gave it enormous access to detailed military intelligence. Given Afghanistan’s hostile terrain (particularly with the onset of winter) it was inconceivable for the US to conquer Afghanistan without this inside information. Besides, getting Pakistan on its side was an important political necessity in US diplomacy to win over, or at least neutralize, the Islamic countries in its "war against terrorism".

Both countries were suitably rewarded by America for their support, by the lifting of sanctions. For Pakistan, even those were lifted that were imposed at the time of the Musharraf coup. In addition, Pakistan was granted millions of dollars in the form of loan waivers, grants for Afghan refugees, and bailouts for its ailing economy. Politically, it also got the US, at least for the time being, to refrain from categorizing the Kashmiri militants as ‘terrorists’.

The Indian rulers, desperate to be the US’s sole gendarme in the region were unhappy with the attention that Pakistan was getting from the ‘international community’, and its involvement in the so-called war against international terrorism. The bootlicking Jaswant Singh went scurrying from capital to capital, to try and convince his bosses that Pakistan was the main sponsor of terrorism in the region and should not be a part of the front against terrorism, and that all the pro-Pakistani Islamic groups operating in Kashmir should be a part of the US list of terrorist organizations. He was able to add weight to his argument due to a bomb explosion at the J & K assembly, killing 42 persons, which coincidentally occurred on the very day of his arrival to the US. Besides, the Indian rulers went on a major propaganda drive to prove Pakistani/ISI links with the Sept. 11 attack, manufacturing one ‘proof’ after another. The Americans though, were reluctant to open a number of fronts against Islamic militants at one time, and preferred to concentrate their focus on the Taliban and Osama Bin Laden’s network for the time being. They have made it clear that, at a later date, they intend to go after terrorists everywhere.

Yet, Indian servility and readiness to be at the beck-and-call of the US, helped the latter pressurize Pakistan into total capitulation. In fact, keeping up the pressure on Pakistan’s eastern front, with India’s hot pursuit syndrome, and continuous propaganda from India about manufactured proof of Pak./ISI involvement in the Sept. 11 attack, helped the US bring pressure on the Pakistan rulers to continuously toe its line, in the face of mounting opposition from Islamic forces within their country.

In the long run, the US is well aware that Pakistan will be an unreliable ally, due to the powerful influence of Islamic fundamentalists, not only in civil society, but also within the government and army. On the other hand the Indian ruling classes with its Hindutva, anti-Islamic bias, can be a more reliable ally. For the imperialists, the BJP and its coalition partners have proved to be their most faithful puppies, but even if displaced, the opposition has shown itself to be nearly as servile. Besides, the US has more to gain by keeping India firmly within its sphere of influence, due to its large size — which gives it a vast market and also military muscle power to dominate the region. Anyhow, Bush’s "crusade", the Zionist’s anti-Arab mania, and the BJP’s anti-Muslim fanaticism have a common thread.

The US will no doubt be pleased by the Indian ruler’s performance in the wake of the Sept. 11 bombing. There was probably no other country in the world (besides Britain) that offered its services to the US so unconditionally, without asking for any reciprocal favour. Even the tiny Arab countries took their pound-of-flesh in return for even limited support to America’s war. What is even more disgusting is how the US ambassador to India, Robert Blackwill, has been moving around India after Sept. 11, as though he runs the country. He has not only held meetings with the Prime Minister, Home Minister, and a host of other Central ministers; but has also been meeting Chief Ministers, opposition leaders, and even the three chiefs of the Indian armed forces. It is unimaginable that a mere ambassador of a country can openly be allowed free access to not only the government, but also to the country’s military and security apparatus. And, a section of the Indian media, in their servility to the US, show all the political bigwigs fawning over this imperialist bandit in our country.

The Indian rulers have three goals in whipping up a mass hysteria against so-called terrorism.

First, it seeks to utilize this campaign to unleash even more brutal terror against the nationality movements of Kashmir and the North East and against the communist revolutionaries {particularly the CPI (ML)(PW) & MCC} in the name of fighting terrorism. For this purpose they are also seeking international assistance, particularly from the US and Israel. Blatant foreign intervention in the security matters of the country is being excused in the name of fighting terrorism.

Second, in the name of a global campaign against terrorism, it is paving the way for greater and greater US intervention in the affairs of our country — not only in the sphere of finance, industry and commerce, but also militarily and in security matters. Where it would have found it difficult to justify such blatant foreign intervention under normal circumstances, it hopes to get away with this treachery taking the fig leaf of a global war against terrorism.

Third, the hysteria against terrorism is a good distraction to deflect people’s growing anger against the government, resulting from their mass impoverisation. Imperialist dictated policies of globalisation has wrecked the economy and reduced lakhs and lakhs of people to acute poverty. Yet, it continues with its policies of ‘economic reforms’, pushing thousands more into poverty each day. Such excessive exploitation is the breeding ground for revolt. Not only does the hysteria against ‘terrorism’ act as a diversion, it also lays the basis for increased all round repression on the struggling masses. Aware that peoples’ discontent will grow, the government, through this fear psychosis, is systematically introducing fascist measures, denying even the limited rights of the people — enormous powers are being given to the police, military and intelligence services; all in the name of countering terrorism.

This campaign against terrorism, whether at the global or the all-India level, is, in essence, targeted at the oppressed masses; specifically those who are fighting imperialism and/or local reaction.

Today, when the promoters of this monstrous system have declared all-out war, the lines of demarcation are getting more clearly drawn — the fascist, communalist, racist, war-mongerers and their apologists on the one side, and the mass of suffering humanity on the other. All must choose where they stand. All revolutionaries must stand on the side of the people and slowly win them to revolutionary communism, by standing in the forefront of all the battles. Armed with Maoist ideology and guns in their hands, they must lead the struggles for justice, not only in the factories and fields, but against all forms of oppression, whether it takes the form of national, religious, caste, communal, racial or patriarchal. It is only then that the masses can be drawn away from all forms of alien ideologies (like religious fundamentalist) and brought into the democratic and socialist stream for change.

Today the Indian rulers are utilizing the atmosphere created by the US war against terrorism and Afghanistan, to enhance their anti-Islamic hysteria and increase repressive measures. They have banned the student organization SIMI and arrested hundreds of their activists. On the other hands, they are aggressively propagating hindu chauvinism, promoting fascists organisations like the Bajrang Dal and preparing for pogroms against Muslims. They have been arresting democrats propagating against the US attack on Afghanistan and the Indian ruler’s complicity with the US. They have charged with treason students of Delhi who were merely propagating against the US attack on Afghanistan. They are planning the re-introduction of the draconian TADA. And they have been issuing war-like threats to Pakistan, talking of "hot pursuit".

All these policies must be vehemently opposed by all democrats and progressive people in the country. The ban on SIMI must be immediately revoked; all the arrested must be released unconditionally; the re-introduction of TADA must be strongly opposed; and all those arrested in anti-US demonstrations must be immediately released and there must be full guarantee for the right to protest.

The people of our country must come out on to the streets and vehemently oppose the war of US imperialism, and oppose its aggression of Afghanistan or any other country in the world. We must also oppose the Indian ruler’s attempts to draw the country into the US’s war on Afghanistan by the use of Indian territory an/or Indian people by the American military establishment. We must oppose any attempts at provoking a war with Pakistan in the name of "hot pursuit" or on any other pretext. The chief foreign enemy of the Indian people is not Pakistan or the Islamic fundamentalists. It is the US imperialists and their collaborators who are robbing the entire wealth and natural resources of our country.

Today, thousands have been coming out on to the streets in protest against US aggression and the Indian ruler’s capitulation to them. In all parts of the country anti-war, anti-US fronts are coming up. The time has come for all democratic and progressive people in our country to unite, and launch countywide protests against US imperialism and their Indian lackeys.

 

<Top>

 

Home  |  Current Issue  |  Previous Issue  |  Archives  |  Revolutionary Publications  |  Links  |  Subscription