In the first week of April, the meeting of
gangsters — the Chief Ministers of 4 states, the Home minister and other
officials from 5 states — took a decision to hold their co-ordination meeting of
higher officials of these five states every fortnight. According to this
decision, the DGPs of Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa and
Bihar met in Bhopal, in the last week of April. This time, they jointly proposed
an action plan of Rs. 23,000 crores to spend in the ‘Naxalite infected’
areas of these five states.
Before and after the
gangsters’ meeting two points got prominence in the media. First, talks should
be initiated by those state governments which are affected with ‘left-wing (or
Naxal) extremism.’ Second, to clamp a ban on the CPI(ML)[PW] in all these five
states (not only AP as exists today) and also throughout the country.
While on the one hand, the Home Minister, Advani,
and Chief Ministers Chandrababu Naidu and Digvijay Singh pretend to the media
(and even in the assembly) for ‘talks with Naxalites’, on the other, they
adopt methods that are exactly the opposite of their public statements.
Increased Offensive
of the States under Leadership of the Centre
Since the end of the 1980s and the early 1990s the
AP government has been pursuing the Central government to initiate the direct
coordination of the four state governments, to curb the CPI(ML)[PW]’s activities
in their regions. A number of meetings were conducted in the last decade and
numerous recommendations were also made by officials. In the course of time, the
AP government achieved two gains. First, regular coordination of the Special
Force Operations began. Second, the governments began regular exchange of
experiences and information. Apart from this, the AP government — whether under
the leadership of the Congress or the TDP — emerged as a leader and guide to the
other states, in methods of suppression of the revolutionary movement.
In the course of time, these have developed into a
uniform policy on all these battle fronts. Let us first look at one major form
adopted in all states; and then turn to the uniformity in the general military
methods of operation.
(a) Informers’ Mechanism :
The preparation of an informers’ network and the use of covert operations has
got more and more prominence in the enemy’s tactics.
Initially, some anti-people lumpens and local class
enemies kept in touch with the police, and tried their best to pass on
information of village activities and on the movements of the party organisers
and the squads. When the class struggle intensified, setting new goals, the
enemy tried their best to crush the movement through an offensive war. Though
the state now deployed a large number of special armed forces, it failed to
suppress the movement. At this juncture, they began to systematically buy/employ
hostile elements from the locality into their intelligence network. But, the
party was prompt in punishing these elements. So, once again the enemy changed
its methods. They secretly picked up new elements, who were unexposed to the
revolutionary masses, to provide them information on activities and on the
guerrilla squads. In this, they were to some extent successful, leading to
damage in some incidents.
The party and people did check and punish these
unhealthy elements from time to time, but, in the on-going war, total control
was not always possible. The enemy encouraged these elements, continuously
enhancing their network, in order to collect information of the revolutionary
camp. Ofcourse, this method of espionage, keeping track of dissidents amongst
the people, is an established traditional form, ever since the state structure
came into being. Only now it has achieved sophisticated forms with the five
state governments, using this network to extract information, and to regularly
upgrade and modernise its structure.
Some specific features of this
network are :
(i) Agents are paid regularly, (ii) Their
whereabouts are kept secret (iii) To avoid exposure, contacts are maintained by
the concerned person alone — no third person is involved. (iv) Modern
communication equipment is provided to the main informers (v) Weapons are freely
distributed to many informers (vi) A recent development has been that informers
are being encouraged to kill mass organisation activists and also members of the
PGF (People’s Guerrilla Forces). (vii) When open, unquestionable authority is
given to these killers to control/threaten the area people (viii) Most exposed
persons are generally recruited into the regular service of the police
department. (ix) Direct staff of the armed forces also engage in information
collection through various covers within the villages — taking the form of
shopkeepers, employees, doctors etc. (x) In the name of ‘counseling’, government
officials (mainly police) maintain regular contact with families of
revolutionaries. They try and pick-up detailed information, and seek to win over
some weak elements to play the role either of informer, or as a mediator to get
the comrade from that family to surrender.
Such then are some of their techniques of
information-gathering.
(b) Besides this, the enemy forces have been
adopting a number of methods to counter the people’s guerrilla forces. The
imperialists have developed techniques of anti-insurgency and anti-jungle
warfare, based on their experiences in suppressing various guerrilla struggles
in many countries. Due to the intensification of the class struggle in AP, the
state government has initiated many of these methods, learnt from their
imperialist masters. These are now being spread to all the five affected states.
The
following table gives a picture of the growing uniformity in methods being
adopted in all states :-
Form
|
State
|
AP
|
NT
|
DK
|
Bihar
|
1.
Modernisation
of
force
(training
in
anti-insurgency
and
jungle
war-fare,
in
the
use
of
sophisticated
weapons
and
communication
equipment.)
|
Already
modernised.
|
Modernised
|
i) In Maharashtra
(MR)
it
is
modernised.
ii)
In
other
states
modernisation
is
going
on
|
Modernisation
is
going
on.
|
2.
Construction
of
Roads
|
All
the
roads
in
the
struggle
area
are
well
built.
|
Well
built
throughout
the
area
|
i)
In
MR,
roads
are
well
built
by
the
BRO
(of
the
Army).
ii)
In
MP,
this
process
has
been
initiated.
iii)
The
Orissa
govt.
has
built
motorable
roads
through
different
projects.
|
Being
a
plain
area,
all
the
connecting
village
roads
are
motorable.
|
3.
Communica
-tion
network
|
The
special
forces
that
are
engaged
on
the
battle
front
are
using
various
modern
equipments
|
The
AP
govt.
concentrated
its
equipment
mainly
in
this
region.
|
i)
In
MR,
modern
equipment
is
in
use.
ii)
In
other
areas
police
wireless
sets
are
the
main
source.
|
Acquiring
modern
equipment
|
4.
Informers’
network
|
Trying
to
make
it
into
well-built
force
|
Depending
mainly
on
the
informer
network
in
many
encounters
|
i)
In
MR,
the
informers
network,
is
one
of
the
main
regular
force.
ii)
In
MP
till
now
not
well
built.
|
At
an
infant
stage.
(not
a
well
built
force)
|
5.
Using
ex-squad
members
who
have
degenerated
and
joined
the
government
forces.
|
Mainly
in
North
and
South
Telangana,
this
form
has
developed
into
a
dependable
source
to
counter
the
PGFs
(People’s
Guerrillas
Forces)
and
Party.
|
It
is
not
a
main
form.
|
Not
a
main
form.
|
6.
Has
stopped
general
patrols
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Continuing
|
7.
Covert
operations
at
all
levels
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Very
less
|
8.
Has
stopped
moving
in
vehicles
in
general
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
The
form
is
in
discussion
|
9.
Moving
on
foot
and
secret
deployment
is
the
main
form
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Sometimes
implementing
|
10.
Using
Auto
weapons
and
now
using
Grenades
and
mortars
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Beginning
to
use
|
11.
Choppers
are
being
pressed
into
service
to
deploy
and
to
lift
the
wounded
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
12a.
Special
force
moving
in
platoon
size
batches
and
staying
in
interior
areas,
when
it
is
on
operational
duty
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
12b.
Achieved
co-ordination,
speed
in
action,
and
quick
deployment
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
i)
Achieved
in
MR.
ii)
In
process
in
MP.
and
iii)
In
Orissa,
weak
|
Not
yet
achieved
|
13a.
Depending
mainly
on
elite
commando
force
and
using
the
para-military
and
state
special
forces
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
i)
MR
–
elite
force
ii)
MP–
decision
was
taken
to
build
up
an
elite
force
|
State
special
and
para-military
combination.
|
13b.
Other
private
armed
formations
|
In
Rayalaseema
landlords
belonging
to
the
ruling
TDP
and
Congress
parties
are
maintaining
armed
gangs
|
No
|
No
|
i)
Ranbeer
Sena
ii)
Number
of
dacoit
gangs
|
14.
Announcing
new
reforms
time
to
time
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
(in
all
three
states)
|
Yes
|
15.
In
the
name
of
rehabilitation
schemes
utilising
the
services
of
ex-squad
members
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
Information
|
16.
All
PS
are
beefed
up
or
shifted
and
fortified
to
face
resistance
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
17. Anti-propaganda taken on a war-footing
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Weak
|
18.
Special
action
plan
has
been
submitted
to
the
Centre
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
In
the
April
meet
officials
accepted
to
generate
Rs.
4000
crores
for
Bihar
|
19.
Fake
encounter
killings
are
the
main
form
of
repression
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
To
some
extent
in
MR.
Not
main
form,
for
the
time
being,
in
other
areas
|
Not
the
main
form
|
These are some of the methods, readied by the enemy
forces, for a uniform mode of operations.
Under the leadership of the CPI(ML)[PW], people
have been resisting these methods in their own way, defeating and exposing the
nature of the state, and rousing the people to fight for their legitimate
demands.
Now the Centre Leads
the Offensive War in the Five States
In 1990, when the Congress came to power, the CM,
Chenna Reddy, temporarily stopped the offensive, in order to consolidate his
position, after being out-of-power for seven years. The other reason, was due to
the failure of the earlier four years of undeclared war on the PW by the then
ruling party (TDP). But, within months, his successor, Congress CM, Janardhan
Reddy, initiated a ruthless repression and banned the CPI (ML)(PW). In the media
he was focussed as the man who will finish the PW. Today, another ruling party
CM, Chandrababu Naidu, is being focussed as the tough man, who will finish off
the PW.
Way back, Jalagam Vengal Rao, was praised by the
media and ruling classes, as the iron man who opposed and fought the 1946/52
Telangana Peasant Rebellion and also the uprisings of the 1960s. At the time of
Naxalbari, the then CM of West Bengal, S.S. Ray, was praised by his own class,
as the man who crushed the movement that set Bengal afire.
Ofcourse, the RSS, BJP and other Sangh Parivar
outfits are from birth, anti-communist. So, quite naturally their main leader,
Advani, as also the young upstarts, like home minister of state, Vidyasagar Rao,
as also the goonda BJP MLA from AP, Indrasena Reddy, and their like, will have
as their chief aim to fight the revolutionary movement to the finish.
Yet the revolutionary movement from Telangana to
Srikakulam; from Naxalbari to the current ongoing movements of AP, NT, DK and
Bihar continue to develop and advance towards its goal, even in the midst of the
state’s offensive war.
Now, with the BJP assuming power at the centre,
under the leadership of Advani, they plan to make a final assault on the CPI (ML)[PW].
In this scheme he is getting much support from the AP, Maharashtra and Orissa
governments. Particularly it is the AP government that is egging on the other
states, and even the Centre. Quite naturally, Advani and Naidu have a common
agenda. Now, a nation-wide offensive has been planned against the PW, as per
proposals offered by the AP government, enthusiastically applauded by the RSS
and Sangh Parivar, and initiated and led by Advani at the Centre. Not
surprisingly, Karnataka recently recorded its first ever ‘encounter’ killing in
its revolutionary history. Also, in Tamil Nadu, fake encounters have once again
been started. In West Bengal the state is waiting, closely observing and getting
ready to pounce.
At present, the Centre is taking steps tactfully,
using intrigue and cunning in its moves. But, in the near future it will
directly intervene to increase repression.
Now let us turn to some of the measures that it is
talking about.
(i) Question Of
Talks
From end 1999 Advani has been telling the press,
that he is ready to talk with the North East nationality and J&K leaders. To
facilitate this process he recently began to release some J&K leaders, in the
name of creating an atmosphere for talks. Later, he also said that his ministry
is thinking of releasing some sikh leaders, who have been in jail for a long
time. So also, before the gangsters conclave, he told the press that "the
centre is considering asking Naxalite infested states to begin negotiations with
the ultra-left outfits." At the end of the conclave, Advani added
"the Central ban on Naxalite outfits was necessary,
even though states will try and open a dialogue with them."
In this process a debate was begun in the AP
Assembly on this issue, but it did not proceed far, due to the "fear of
Naxalites". The Speaker said "those who are not afraid, can speak."
Then, only the Hyderabad-based MLAs, of the BJP and Congress — Indrasena Reddy
and Govardhan — spoke. Both these, are well known amongst the people of AP, for
their goonda and criminal record since a young age. Apart from them, no one was
willing to speak up. While the Assembly was in process, most local papers
reported that the AP home minister, Devender Goud, was willing to resign as home
minister, due to family pressures.
Clearly, these ruling class hoodlums fear to face
the people. The CPI(ML)[PW] has also been keeping an eye on all these rulers,
and the extent of their anti-people activities, and has been educating the
masses to fight them. Hence their fear and demoralisation. The AP government
unleashed its first offensive war on the PW in the 1985-89 period; its second
offensive war was between 1990 and 1996; and from 1997 onwards the state
government, under instructions from its imperialist masters, and under direct
guidance from Naidu, has been implementing a new (3rd) round of offensive
tactics.
After assuming power in 1989, the Congress
government expressed its opinion to open a dialogue. At that time the AP state
committee of the PW responded by saying they were willing if they stop offensive
war. In Maharashtra the government has unleashed intensive repression since 1993
onwards. This was started by the Congress government, it continued under the BJP/Shiv
Sena combine, and till today there is no relaxation under the new
Congress-alliance government. In Madhya Pradesh, when the BJP was in power they
unleashed severe repression, which continued under president’s rule. Later,
there was some relaxation due to people’s pressure, but soon, the government
again increased the repression, specifically in those pockets where the movement
was weak. Prior to the elections the CM, Digvijay Singh repeated again and
again, at Jagdalpur, Raipur, Bhopal, etc., that he was willing for talks. The
DKSZC responded saying they were ready to talk. In Orissa, class struggle is
weak, so the repression is less. Yet, way back in Biju Patnaik’s days, the CM
expressed a view to talk with the PW. In Bihar too, Laloo has time and again
expressed his willingness to hold talks with the Naxalites.
In AP, on the contrary, while talking of talks, the
number of false encounter killings have increased. Specifically, this has been
the case, after the February-March 2000 counter-offensive of the PW. Prior to
this, from December ’99 onwards regular retaliatory attacks occurred in memory
of the three CC martyrs. The entire state shook with fear. In the process,
Madhav Reddy too was killed. At that time itself the DGP, Dora, told a TV
interviewer, that they will kill more PW men, in order to finish them off.
Actually, during this 3rd round of attack, false
encounters, encircling of squads/organisers in their shelters, on the basis of a
tip offs from informers; showering bullets with automatic weapons; or throwing
grenades with launchers or mortar fire — has become a routine affair by the AP’s
elite dog force, the greyhounds. Yet, the guerrilla forces are effectively
resisting them, in their own way, with much less fire-power — often using only
country-made guns. In 90% of the real encounter incidents none are injured on
both sides, with the guerrillas effectively retreating. Such pitched battles
have been going on since many years. But, on certain occasions, the number of PW
guerrillas martyred have been as high as 13. Once, in Medak district, one after
another, four squads were eliminated by the enemy troops. Though this was a
major loss to the Medak movement, in practice these losses are overcome, with
the people and party boldly facing up to such losses.
In the month of April, the PW lost 26 comrades in
three major incidents and a number of minor ones. Yet, the AP state committee as
also the NTSZC of the CPI(ML)[PW] together with the mass organisations and
masses under their influence are able to sustain their positions, and advance
amidst these losses. It does not demoralise them. Though the soil is red with
the blood of revolutionaries, the sons and daughters arise again and again from
the red earth in large numbers, to avenge the killings of their comrades.
But every revolutionary war has its laws. It is
only by applying these laws properly, that we can advance and retreat. As Com.
Mao said, "War is a contest of strength, but the original state of strength
changes in the course of war. Here the efforts made to score more victories and
commit fewer errors are the decisive factor. Objective factors make the change
possible, but it requires correct directives and efforts on the subjective side
to turn this possibility into actuality. At that time such efforts become
decisive." (Mao Collected Works, Vol. II, On Protracted People’s War)
He also added that, "It is only when there is a
wide disparity between the enemy’s strength and ours, that, acting on the
principle of conserving our strength and biding our time to defeat the enemy we
advocate retreating to base area and luring in deep, for only by so doing can we
create or find conditions favourable for our counter-offensive." (Strategy
in China’s Revolutionary War, Mao Collected Works, Vol.I, page 219)
In the course of struggle, the PW is adopting
tactics according to the concrete situation, and while conserving its strength
it seeks to advance to a higher stage with renewed strength. So, at this
juncture, depending on the concrete situation, if the enemy, is ready for talks,
the party can talk. For these talks, the enemy will put its own conditions, the
PW will put theirs. While the people will judge both; there will always remain
vacillators to jump to the proposals of dialogue but it is up to the leadership
steeled in the flame of struggles to decide terms and conditions to extract
maximum leverage out of such talks, if any.
(ii) Clamping Ban In
All States
Actually, in NT and the guerrilla zone areas of
Maharashtra and MP, the government has not allowed any open legal programme
since 1984. In Bihar, open programmes are permitted to some extent, but the MKSS,
an open peasant organisation, was banned way back in 1986. In AP, from 1992
onwards the party and mass organisations have been banned.
In NT and DK, after deepening the mass base of the
party, since 1995 a number of mass secret programmes could be organised. Upto
15,000 people have participated in these programmes/meetings without knowledge
of the enemy. At the initiative of a single guerrilla squad, meetings from 1000
to 5000 people have been successfully held, addressed by SAC, and upto CC
members. In future, as the movement advances towards the higher stage of
Guerrilla Zone, even more people will rally under direct party leadership, in
such mass open/secret programmes.
The party from the very beginning itself has
prepared the people, mass organisations, party members and PGFs for underground
life and to build open/secret mass movements to counter the enemy’s onslaught.
So, basically the clamping of a ban will have little affect on the movement —
except, of course, on the open magazines. The party has no illusions on the
so-called ‘democracy’ of the existing system. If the struggle advances to a
higher phase, irrespective of a ban, the state will behave with cruelty. In
fact, in the history of the AP movement, a number of civil rights leaders were
killed when there was no ban. In the history of the world proletarian movements,
the ruling classes have always suppressed the rights of the downtrodden. People
in our country, for example, are well aware how, during Indira Gandhi’s rule,
‘democracy’ was implemented through the Emergency in the mid 1970s.
Even today, the Sangh Parivar attacks minorities in
different parts of the country with impunity. What role are the so-called
democratic institutions playing to counter it ? After assuming power in the
states and at the Centre, the BJP directly attacks its opponents. So,
irrespective of the party in power at the states or at the Centre, they will
play a similar role to suppress the revolutionary, democratic, nationality
movements, and to suppress the backward castes, the minorities and women.
Some may argue that a ban will give more powers to
the state machinery. These friends are unable to understand the real character
of the ruling class and the role of the state. If one nurses illusions on the
role of the state, this will soon get shattered if they merely observe the
history of mankind.
In order to push for the ban, the imperialist
lap-dog, Naidu, told the CMs’ meet, that his intelligence machinery has
identified certain clues which shows that the PW is maintaining relations with
some radical organisations abroad like in Peru, the Philippines, Belgium,
Norway, Germany, Turkey, Nepal, Bangladesh, etc. And that, internally it is
maintaining relations with the nationality movements. Some newspapers reported
that Naidu dropped this bombshell at the CMs’ meet.
Alas ! Who are these gangsters fooling ? The entire
world revolutionary camp knows of the PW’s achievements in India. The PW and the
above mentioned countries’ communist parties, have jointly conducted and/ or
participated in a number of programmes in India and abroad. This has been openly
proclaimed. It is the duty of the world proletariat to help and participate in
the struggles of the proletariat in different countries, wherever and whenever
it is possible. Naidu, open your lap-top and observe the web pages of the
revolutionary movements, to know how the unity of the world-wide working class
is forging ahead. This century will witness more and more victories of the
international proletariat.
(iii) The
Government’s Main Approach Is A ‘Long-Term Perspective’ Against
Revolutionaries
Advani told some reporters that he is not going to
crush the movement as S.S.Ray did in West Bengal in the late ’60s and early
’70s. Does that display a democratic face of Advani ? Certainly not ! Advani
knows very well, that the present movement cannot be so easily crushed as that
of the 1970s. In those days, as the party committed left-adventurist mistakes,
it was crushed within a span of two to three years. But, from this setback in
the movement the party has learned lessons. So what Ray, Vengal Rao, etc., and
the Centre was able to achieve then, in the last two decades, though all have
tried to crush the movement, none have succeeded. Because, in the on-going
movement, people have stood firmly with the party, and the party has rectified
its left and right deviations.
But, over these past 30 years, the ruling classes
have also taken some lessons. Their main lesson learnt is to adopt a long-term
strategy against the Indian revolutionary movement. So, the ruling classes, at
both the state and the Centre, consistently adopt this approach. Though parties
criticise one another, blaming earlier governments for not adopting a firm
policy towards the PW, this is mere pretense — the policies have been fairly
consistent. So, not only in those areas where the struggle has reached a higher
level, like in AP, NT, DK and Bihar, but also in those areas where the
revolutionary movement is still in a preparatory or embryonic form, the enemy
has a strategic understanding on how to face it. Besides, they also get timely
advice from the imperialists, who continuously assess the trends of the ongoing
world’s people’s movements of Asia, Africa and Latin America, and send
suggestions to their governments.
So revolutionaries need to prepare the masses and
the party on their ability to advance the movement, in the midst of white
terror. Now-a-days, the ruling classes will not allow organised protests in any
form. All organised protests, even if it has no programme of armed revolution,
will face repression when it takes place. So,it is the duty of revolutionaries
to discover newer and newer tactics to be adapted to the concrete situations.
Appeal to
Revolutionaries and Democrats
The Indian government, irrespective of the party in
power, is selling out the country to the multinationals, the World Bank, the IMF,
etc. All PSUs are in the process of being sold to the Indian big bourgeois
houses and the TNCs. Major subsidies have been cut under instructions from the
World Bank and IMF. Whatever can be sold, is up for sale by both the Central and
state governments. Therefore, it is time now for all democrats and the people to
display patriotism and fight against the policies of the ruling classes that are
selling our country’s wealth to the imperialists at throw-away prices. The
ruling class traitors pose as patriots. So there is urgency for all the masses
and democrats to come out openly and resist these policies, and organise
resistance struggles wherever possible.
In this situation it s also the duty of all Maoist
forces to unite together to resist the enemy. Recently the MCC, through an open
leaflet has declared a stop to the physical attacks on the PW. In response, the
PW also immediately called a halt to its counter-attacks on the MCC. In this
positive environment the two need to come together to unitedly fight the enemy.
Whatever deviations both have in their practices needs to be identified and
rectification campaigns undertaken. Then, a strong, combined mass movement can
be built by both parties, that could teach a good lesson to the enemy.
Meanwhile, the parties that are facing the enemy onslaught, would have to
mobilise the broad masses to fight the enemy on its own strength, and allow
problems to be amicably solved in the course of the advancing movement.
In AP, the state government has also been attacking
the other ML groups. These groups, though they preach the parliamentary line,
have also been facing some repression. It is time for these groups to review
their line, learn from the lessons of the Indian revolutionary movement and
rectify their deviations. The last three decades experience of the Indian
revolutionary movement has showed the necessity of discarding the parliamentary
line and the need to fight the right opportunistic line; and the need to
strengthen the armed resistance by choosing armed formations as the main form,
in order to advance the struggles to Guerrilla Zones, Guerrilla Bases and to
Base Areas. For this, strong PGFs, and the building of a strong secret party,
which gives confidence to the masses through its political line and practice, is
the need of the hour.
We hope that positive criticism will help
rectification, or at least an approach develops to unitedly fight the enemy
courageously, and defeat the state’s offensive war.
We can hope that the coming months and years will
give more news of greater and greater resistance of the masses to defeat this
first offensive war against the revolutionaries, by the Central government, led
by the BJP fascist forces. Already the masses of AP, NT, and DK have the
experience of defeating the first and second undeclared offensive war of the
state governments, and resolutely fighting in order to defeat the 3rd offensive
war of the states, and now of the Centre. One hopes of greater and greater
victories of the masses, who are making history.
|